Supreme

The Supreme Court's Myriad Decision: Where Does It Leave the "Inventive …
www.patentdocs.org

cDNA does not present the same obstacles to patentability as naturally occurring, isolated DNA segments. As already explained, creation of a cDNA sequence from mRNA results in an exons-only molecule that is not naturally occurring. Petitioners concede …

12
Like
Save
Parties in Supreme Court DNA Dispute Have Met in Washington Before
www.opensecrets.org

DNA Helix.JPG The Supreme Court found Thursday that human genes in their natural form cannot be patented, resolving an ongoing debate between medical research companies that became a question for the justices in Association for Molecular Pathology …

9
Like
Save
Human DNA not patentable: US Supreme Court
en.tengrinews.kz

Naturally occurring human gene sequences cannot be patented but artificially created DNA can be, the US Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday, AFP reports. The verdict represented a compromise between the goals of the biotech industry, which …

6
Like
Save
Biotech industry worries over Supreme Court DNA ruling
www.contracostatimes.com

WASHINGTON — The US Supreme Court's rejection Thursday of natural DNA patent protection could hurt biotech companies, but specialists said it left enough safeguards for the industry to keep innovating. The court ruled that Myriad Genetics, which sells …

7
Like
Save
Supreme Court: Human Genes Cannot Be Patented
us.rd.yahoo.com

The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that companies cannot patent parts of naturally-occurring human genes, a decision with the potential to profoundly affect the emerging and lucrative medical and biotechnology industries.

3
Like
Save
FRC Praises Supreme Court Decision on DNA
www.sys-con.com

Is Your Business 100% Ready for the New Era of Cloud Computing and Big Data? The Only Enterprise IT Event in 2013 Covering the Entire Scope of both Cloud & Big Data Come to New York and get yourself up to date with the Big Data revolution!

10
Like
Save
American Supreme Court says human DNA cannot be patented
www.ngrguardiannews.com

THE United States (U.S.) Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that human genes may not be patented, but artificially copied DNA can be claimed as intellectual property. The court quashed patents held by a Utah-based firm on two genes linked to breast …

4
Like
Save
Nigerian oil tycoon loses Supreme Court battle with English wife in landmark ruling that forces him to hand over property held as company assets
www.dailymail.co.uk

Michael Prest, 50, one of Britain’s most successful black businessmen, argued that he could not pay his former wife as his assets were owned by his companies, not by him.

4
Like
Save
Supreme Court DNA ruling endangers basic rights (Other Views)
saratogian.com

Every time judges instruct juries in criminal cases, they caution jurors to be wary that simply because a person has been arrested does not mean that the person committed the crime, that the fact that the person stands before them accused of …

10
Like
Save
EDITORIAL: Supreme Court's DNA ruling endangers basic rights
www.registercitizen.com

Every time judges instruct juries in criminal cases, they caution jurors to be wary that simply because a person has been arrested does not mean that the person committed the crime, that the fact that the person stands before them accused of …

6
Like
Save